Oh, So It's OUR Fault...

Elvira Arellano appeared yesterday before the Mexican congress to speak about her "plight" and the similar "struggle" faced by other illegal invaders. Here is the English translation of her schpiel:

"The United States is the one who broke the law first. By letting people cross over without documents; by letting people pay taxes. For me it has been very hard. But I know I'm not alone."

As she speaks, she is surrounded by Mexican officials. She tears up when she talks about how "hard" it's been, and several nearby men give her a consoling little pat on the shoulder. Does anyone else see the flagrant line of bullshit in this? Her argument is that we are the ones at fault for letting them come! This is absolutely ludicrous!

Lemme tell you illegals out there something (and I know you're reading judging by the hate mail I'm getting on my personal page): I didn't let you do shit. I never allowed you to sneak across my border. If it had been up to me, I'd have been there armed to the teeth with as many people as I could find to meet you and send you right back across the border, where you belong. You are NOT winning any arguments by breaking our laws and blaming it on us. Your argument reeks of a prison inmate mentality, the idea that a criminal is never at fault for the things they do. "He left all that expensive equipment in the car where I could see it! It's his fault for tempting me!" Or how about this one: "the front door was standing open! I didn't think she'd mind if I came in! And when I saw her, her beautiful body was too tempting! If she'd shut her door, I wouldn't have been tempted! It's the victim's fault!"

I've actually heard criminals use these arguments. I have listened to juveniles use this bullshit to explain away their complete lack of self control. And in this day and age, when everyone is so uppity about hurting someone's feelings, there are actually people out there who buy it.

The majority of us, however, don't. We know better. You committed your crimes because you wanted to. You made a conscious choice to break the law. Just because you weren't found immediately does not mean that the government is at fault any more than failing to apprehend a murderer makes a police officer at fault for the next murder.

Try again, El Vampira.

Is it Anarchy...or Compassion?

An interesting question was raised on Bill O'Reilly's program a couple of nights ago in regards to the Elvira Arellano case. It's a question that undoubtedly needs to be asked even though the answer is already apparent. If we allow the illegal immigrants coming here to stay, are we being compassionate or are we promoting anarchy?

Not surprisingly, the vast majority of the people I know don't know the details of Elvira Arellano's case. What some major news outlest are saying is simply that she crossed the border, had her child, and was working when she was ordered to self-deport. That was when she took sanctuary in a storefront church to keep ICE away from her and her son.

There's a lot more to it than that. She was caught in America before 9/11 and summarily deported. After her first deportation, she hiked back across the border yet again, making it to Chicago, where she bought fake ID papers, including a stolen social security number. This was after 9/11. Guess where she was working when they found her the second time? Cleaning airplanes on the tarmac at O'Hare airport! Right now, before you read further, think hard about the implication of this fact. An illegal immigrant using a stolen SSN was found working at an international airport on airplanes as they were about to take on passengers and fly again. If she can do it, what's to stop the real bad guys from doing it?

Moving right along...somewhere in the middle of all of this, she bore a son. Because he was born here, little Saul is a US citizen. What is never taken into account is the fact that his mother was never here legally. After the birth of her son, she was arrested again (while working at the airport in Chicago) and ordered to leave the country. She was not deported, she was not strong-armed, she was given time to get her affairs in order and take her family back to her country of origin, which is Mexico.

Instead of obeying said order, she ran to a local church, which happily put her up. There she became a sort of symbol for the "immigrants without borders" movement. She practically dared ICE to come and arrest her by leaving the church to speak at a rally in Los Angeles. I think she wanted to be arrested, and I think it was staged by the groups she was in collusion with; they wanted some kind of martyr. So now we have shitsticks like Aztec Al-Qaeda saying crap like, "Elvira Arellano will not be forgotten!" You'd think an ICE agent shot the woman.

She knowingly and willfully broke the law. She was ordered to leave and disobeyed that order. She was given due process and she flaunted it. If a drug addict on probation broke into a house, his probation would be revoked and he would serve the remainder of his sentence in prison. She's not even in prison; she's in Mexico. Mark my words, she'll be back across that border in no time.
We cannot simply bend the law this way or that because "that person was just here to work." There is no excuse for deliberately defying the law! If we allow that sort of "compassion" for a few people, the termites will come out of the woodwork and expect the same thing. The law doesn't work that way; give something to one person, and the law requires it be offered to all. If we do that, we're opening the door to complete anarchy. What's good for one must be applied to all.

Compassion can be a fine line. Fail to walk it properly and it will end in disaster. We have plenty of our own true martyrs, innocent people taken from us by illegals who said they were just here to work. As for the common argument--that we have to stop the deportations to stop the tragic splitting of families--that is a ridiculous suggestion. They created their situation. If they don't want to split their families up, they can take their families with them back to Mexico. Funny how I never heard anyone suggest this to Elvira as she was being handcuffed.

Is it sinking in yet?

Death Threats

Still think they're all just here to work?

EF Mohammed is on MySpace, and after I invited him to read my blog, this was his response:

"I had a dream that I had EXTERMINATED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE ALL the XENOPHOBE RACIST white po piss subhuman incest inbred "race". I my dream YA'LL white cocKKKroaches that were not fumigated or turned into LAMPSHADES, SOAP BARS or fertilizer MULCH were buried alive or dropped off a chopper several miles off shore at sea without a parachute. Satan's white excrement vomit race and Jewboys are like parasitical rabid dog lice! They need to be oven baked! NEED I SAY MORE HEA YA'LL INCEST INBRED CRACKKKERSHITHEAD COCKKKROACHES?!E.F. Mohammed Martinez aka AZTEC Al-QAEDALA RAZA INTIFADA CYBERGUERRILLA RESISTANCE NATIONAL LIBERATION FRONT

"ELVIRA ARRELLANO WILL NOT BE FORGOTTEN!

"P.S. The ONLY white people that I have ALWAYS supported in their struggle are Northern Ireland's IRA. I met IRA's then Bernadette Devlin some 35 years ago. I have ALWAYS been a strong proIRA adherent. You being a member of an oppressed group (Lesbian), should understand OPPRESSION and DISCRIMINATION! But then again, your inherited privileged whiteness overides ALL other oppressions! That's understandable. I am NOT against ALL white people per se. I am a freedom fighter against ALL XENOPHOBE RACISTS and INJUSTICE! MaKKKe no mistaKKKe! THERE WILL be white racist blood flowing on the streets of ameriKKKa one day and I hope to be there myself cutting their throats!"

Think he's the only fucknut out there who believes this tripe? Think again, folks. He's part of a movement, small but vocal and willing to kill, that actually believes they are being oppressed. But there's so many holes in their droll theories that none of it adds up, and I'm about to knock EF Mohammed off of cloud nine.

First of all, by their logic, we're occupying their land. They think the land was originally Mexican and that Americans, believing in manifest destiny, somehow stole the land from them. Playing by that line of logic, the land was never theirs in the first place. Mexico isn't even theirs. By their own estimation, Mexico belongs to the indigenous people the Spanish conquistadores took it from, and the land they gave up to America after the Spanish-American War belongs to the indians that lived there before their land was taken. Since they ignore this, I refuse to acknowledge any claim they have to American lands.

(That's not to mention the ceding of the land to America after the aforementioned war, which Mexico started to begin with after Texas won its independence--and it was not just "whitey" that fought that battle, either. The Mexican settlers there fought right alongside their American counterparts.)

He calls us xenophobes, racists, and nazis. A xenophobe pretty much is a racist, so he's being a little redundant there, but the thesaurus lists misjudgment, one-sidedness, and injustice as synonyms. What have I misjudged? We've already pointed out that they have no rights to American lands. Since America is a sovereign nation, one governed by laws and rules, the law must be observed and, where necessary, enforced. If it is not we become an anarchist haven ruled by constant chaos. It's not just good people coming across that border! How many times to I have to say it before it sinks in? Criminals are coming across with frightening frequency, and since we don't know who the absconders are, you all need to go the hell home, knock on our front door, and come in the right way. As for injustice, the only injustice here is that I'm being taxed to pay for healthcare, education, and rental assistance I'll never see any use in because none of it is for me or my family. And you could, actually call me one-sided; I will concede that much. I want the law enforced and nothing else will make me happy.

As for Nazis...I touched on that in my last post. The Nazis believed that Austria belonged to Germany and longed to take it by force; eventually they did, and did so violently. It is the same thing EF Mohammed and the La Raza movement is suggesting by threatening to take American land by force. And if this is not an indication of what we're facing, then you folks need a reality check.

There you go, "Aztec Al-Qaeda" (yes, he actually calls himself that). Take a lesson. Don't enter a battle of wits unarmed.

Oh, I almost forgot...your village called, buddy. They miss their idiot.

Crossing The Line

A Mexican extremist, a "reconquisto," wrote a couple of emails to The WatchDog (http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/) that have brazenly--and rather idiotically--crossed the line. In the first message, this was said:

"BEWARE MINUTEMEN! HEED THIS WARNING! I have it by good reliable sources that there are already well placed elements placed in logistic areas throughout the Mexican side of the US Arizona border to protect any and ALL undocumented immigrants from harm crossing the border that might become victimized by ANY and ALL UNAUTHORIZED law enforcement personnel...YOU HAVE JUST DUG YOUR OWN GRAVE! I HOPE TO SEE THE STREETS OF AMERIKKKA RUN RED WITH WHITE XENOPHOBE RACIST MINUTEMEN AND THEIR LIKKKE MINDED WHITE SUPREMACIST NEONAZI TYPES!ANCHOR BABY POWER! CHICANO POWER! ALLAH AKBAR!E.F. Mohammed Martinez aka AL-QAEDA!"

That's only a portion of the Nazi bullshit spewed by this hatemongering fool. I just love how this piece of trash calls me a Nazi when in further rants he sends to WatchDog and GuardDog he goes on to threaten the very same things Adolf Hitler actually did. Their reasons are the same. They want more land. They believe America originally belonged to them, so they want to take it by force.

Your biggest mistake, EF Mohammed, was announcing yourself.

This absolute ignoramus went on to post a "prose" he called "I am the one you love to hate." I wish I could post it, but WatchDog took it down; I can only imagine he's turning it over to the authorities. The gist of it was "I'm the one you love to hate because I'm doing jobs you're too lazy to do...because I have better morals than you...because your money is giving me power...because I'm taking over your country," blah, blah, blah. He seems bent on the "racist xenophobe" crap...so here's MY response, dumbass.

I am the one you love to hate because I've made my country a better place than you're willing to make yours--a job you're too lazy to do.

I am the one you love to hate because I'm smarter, more educated, and the only job you can get is the menial shit that addlepated twits like you are barely qualified for.

I am the one you love to hate because there's a hell of a lot more of me than there are of you.

I am the one you love to hate because I have what you only dream of: a future.

I am the one you love to hate because I speak English, and it's far easier for me to survive in America.

I am the one you love to hate because I am a law-abiding citizen of America, and as such I have the right to vote, assemble, go where I wish, say what I please--and I have the right to own and carry a firearm.

I am the one you love to hate because I'm honest, hard-working, trustworthy and loyal, as compared to you, you backstabbing, lying, stealing piece of shit.

I am the one you love to hate because I have a backbone and I'm not afraid to use it, as opposed to the school of jellyfish that runs where your spine should be.

I am the one you love to hate because I am dignified and honorable, willing to fight to the death to protect my freedom, whereas you just take what you can and run when the odds go bad.

I am the one you love to hate because my balls are bigger than yours, and if you ever bring this fight to my doorstep, I will bitch-slap your race-baiting brown ass all the way back to Mexico City--and you know I'm not kidding, you imbecilic, brainless, puerile, half-baked gutless curr.

I don't like violence. I'd rather not fight if I can help it. But when you threaten me, you cross the line. I almost dare you to start that shit. You think we're mad NOW? Throw down with America and see what happens.

By the way...you're the decendants of Spanish conquistadores, who swept into Mesoamerica and wiped out the Aztecs, Mayans and Olmec. You wanna talk about America originally being Mexican? By your logic, Mexico isn't even Mexican. Texas didn't want to be a part of Mexico, and your ancestors started slaughtering them until the good guys stepped in and kicked your asses back across the Rio Grande. We played your game and won. So shut the hell up.

Everyone Has A CHOICE

Choice is the key word to everything in America. Pro-abortionists call themselves "pro-choice." They make a big to-do about choice, and 99.9% of them are liberal--and support illegal immigrants and their "rights." Late last week, Elvira Arellano, the illegal alien from Mexico who's been holed up in a church in Chicago to avoid deportation, very publicly left the church that protected her from federal immigration officers to join a protest in LA to support the supposed rights of illegal aliens in the United States.

Today, hallelujah, I have received news that she has been deported. And, as expected, the anti-sovereignty activists are screaming bloody murder.

If choice is such a big deal in this world, then why is a bad choice not considered when a crime has been committed? Is a bad choice not to be subject to consequences anymore? Are we not to punish crimes (read: bad choices)?

The howling everyone is doing now is over the separation of Arellano from her 8-year-old US born son. Here's my beef: her son was born in the United States after she illegally crossed the border so that her child would technically be an American. He's an anchor baby. This happens all the time. What nobody seems to realize is that it was a crime that made this kid a US citizen in the first place, and it was Elvira Arellano's choice to commit that crime. She made that choice--the choice to cross the border illegally, go to an American hospital and stick law-abiding American taxpayers with the bill--and she needs to live with it, whether she thought about the consequences beforehand or not. It was her choice to create this situation.

I have no sympathy for her. And if the women having anchor babies here don't like their families being split up, then they should just stay home so the can avoid the issue. As for us--I say we update the law to require that the birth mother be a legal resident for her child to become a US citizen.

Discovery

Today, here in the Phoenix area, deputies from the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office were called to a neighborhood in the far West end of the valley--the Surprise/El Mirage area. Apparently a Hispanic man was caught trying to break into a few vehicles in the area. When deputies arrived and questioned the man, he reported that he was trying to get away from a house in the neighborhood. Why?

The house had a dead body in it.

Most people in America don't just try to get away from a house with a dead body in it; unless you're a criminal here, your first instinct is to call the police and report what you've seen. Naturally, the deputies wanted to know what was going on; since the man had no papers and was suspected of human smuggling, he was arrested and the deputies went to check the house in question.

Sure enough, they found a dead body. The body was of a Hispanic male, age unknown, that had been beaten and shot. Hiding in a closet, two unclothed women cowered. It was a drop house. In the middle of one of the nicer areas of my area, yet another drop house has been discovered. This isn't the first time this has happened.

But wait...it gets better! While investigators were still gagging on the smell in the house, deputies were called to Dysart High School for trespassers. There they spotted three Hispanic people wandering aimlessly about the campus. One was caught but two others escaped on foot.

I'd like to know just how many people aren't downright chilled by this. We know they were illegal aliens, we know they had no idea where they were, and we know they were being kept in a drop house in an affluent neighborhood. One wandered out to steal a car and three others wandered onto a school campus while students were there. As has been established many times over, we don't know who all these people are--and far too many of them are criminals. Does it not absolutely shock everyone that a group of illegals simply walked onto a school campus in the middle of the day? What if they'd been armed? What if they'd been looking for trouble? How do we know they weren't since they were caught before anything could really happen?

We'll never know what the cops may have prevented today. But think about it this way: when thousands of people are killed in one fell swoop, everyone takes notice. However, when thousands are killed over a long period of time, people get bored and stop caring. We're being worn down, and we have to put a stop to it before any more innocent lives are lost.

This is MY Country!

Not long ago, 46-year-old Nanuma Lavulavu, the matriarch of a Tongan family, was killed in an accident deliberately caused by a drunk driver.

The driver was 26-year-old Guadalupe Perez-Bojorquez. Just before 7 p.m. on Tuesday, 19 June, MCSO deputy Rob Kinnet was driving in his unmarked Ford Expedition heading East on Durango Street (from 27th ave) when he spotted the driver of a silver Ford Taurus throwing a Bud Light bottle out his window. As he called his dispatchers he counted eight bottles total going out the window. At some point, Bojorquez threw his car into reverse and stood on the gas, ramming Kinnet’s SUV. Kinnet, still on the phone with dispatchers, turned around and headed back to his substation.

He quickly noticed the Taurus screaming up on his tailpipe like a bat out of hell. Bojorquez pulled up alongside officer Kinnet and rammed him again. He purposely broadsided Kinnet several times until he finally threw him into oncoming Eastbound traffic.

Directly in front of Nanuma Lavulavu.

After the wreck, Phoenix police found him hiding nearby. Kinnet, though injured himself, had attempted to render aid to Mrs. Lavulavu; her leg had been severed in the crash. Bojorquez blew a 0.16—twice the legal limit—and when police searched his vehicle they found cocaine. He was combative but eventually offered an excuse: he suspected that Kinnet was a cop. He didn’t want to get caught. So he used techniques he’d seen on TV to try to kill Kinnet. In the process he injured a police officer and killed an innocent driver.

Here’s the kicker—Bojorquez is not only illegal, but he’s been sent back to Mexico five times…once in 1997, twice in 1998, once in 2001, and once in 2002. In each case, he was arrested for DUI or some other offense. The 2001 arrest was for assaulting a police officer, a very serious felony. But instead of prosecuting him, feds gave him the option of “voluntary departure.”

In plain English, that means Bojorquez was given no jail time and was never held accountable for what he’d done. They just sent him home, not caring whether he’d come back and, in fact, knowing that he probably would. At the jail I worked in, inmates being deported would smile at us on their way out and say, “see you next year!” Bojorquez was one of these people.

Mehei Lavulavu, Nanuma’s daughter-in-law, expressed the family’s rage over their loss. Who can blame them? But whom, exactly, should bear the guilt? The main criminal in this case is Bojorquez, who knowingly and deliberately flaunted the laws of this country by continuing to come back and commit more crimes.

But what about the immigration officials? Instead of allowing him to be prosecuted, they simply let him go. By refusing to enforce the law, they gave him license to keep coming and breaking the law. They practically encouraged him to do what he did, because they proved that the law no longer rules in America.

ICE spokesman Vinnie Picard said, “Even with an order to deport, there’s no magic necklace that goes on them that would prevent them from coming back across the border. When you’re looking at hundreds of thousands of people, there’s just no feasible way to imprison that many people for felony violations, or misdemeanor violations, for that matter.” Okay…so we should just give up, I suppose.

That is no excuse for the thousands of Americans killed by illegals. That does not assuage the grief of the families of the innocent victims who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time and never had a chance. By that mentality, we should just stop enforcing the law altogether and live in a state of total anarchy; there’s hundreds of thousands of criminals out there. How do we imprison them all? Why even bother?

This is America, goddammit, and it’s MY country. Enforce the law. Seal the borders. Send the illegals home. Stop giving criminals so many chances and give them the punishment they deserve. Then, and only then, will the pendulum swing the other way.

Oh…the Lavulavu family is a family of immigrants. But they came here legally.